Comments on: TSQL Challenge #13 Break The Batches, Pacmann Arithmetics Around Case http://www.waldar.org/blog/200909/tsql-challenge-13-break-batch-pacmann-arithmetics-case SQL behind Business Intelligence Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:03:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Waldar http://www.waldar.org/blog/200909/tsql-challenge-13-break-batch-pacmann-arithmetics-case/comment-page-1#comment-35 Waldar Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:03:20 +0000 http://www.waldar.org/blog/?p=489#comment-35 In fact, this time Oracle is the winner. With the fixed integers test including the case statement, I ran 1e8 loops in Oracle in 16.4 seconds against 1e7 loops in SQL Server in 7.5 seconds. In fact, this time Oracle is the winner.

With the fixed integers test including the case statement, I ran 1e8 loops in Oracle in 16.4 seconds against 1e7 loops in SQL Server in 7.5 seconds.

]]> By: Pacmann http://www.waldar.org/blog/200909/tsql-challenge-13-break-batch-pacmann-arithmetics-case/comment-page-1#comment-34 Pacmann Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:47:24 +0000 http://www.waldar.org/blog/?p=489#comment-34 Hi Waldar ! You're right, that's the way we should always do it... and of course Uncle Tom would agree with you ! "You assume : i don't care Test, test, test, show me results and evidence !" (Right, it's probably not an exact quote :)) But i'm a bit sad that once again, your results show that SQL Server performs better :) :) :) Hi Waldar !

You’re right, that’s the way we should always do it… and of course Uncle Tom would agree with you !
“You assume : i don’t care
Test, test, test, show me results and evidence !”
(Right, it’s probably not an exact quote :))

But i’m a bit sad that once again, your results show that SQL Server performs better :) :) :)

]]>